Airbus A380 wiring: tool configuration as engineering risk
Harnesses designed in incompatible versions of CATIA across sites did not fit the airframes.

- Programme
- Airbus A380 wiring harnesses
- Year
- 2006
- Sector
- Aerospace & Defence
- Outcome
- Major delivery delays
What happened
The Airbus A380 suffered major delivery delays linked to its wiring harnesses.
The harnesses had been designed in incompatible versions of CATIA across different sites, and they did not fit the airframes.
What was found
Public statements by Airbus and EADS in 2006 attributed the delays to the wiring harness problems and the incompatible design tool versions used across sites.
Engineering lesson
The configuration of engineering tools is part of the configuration of the product. When sites work in different tool versions, the interface between their work can break without any individual design being wrong.
Tool configuration across sites is an engineering risk and needs managing like one.
The practice this points to
Bring engineering tool versions and data formats under configuration control across all sites contributing to a design.
Verify cross-site interfaces using the shared, controlled model, rather than assuming compatibility between local copies.
Where Kelvora fits
Kelvora is a requirements and assurance platform that connects to engineering tools and records which source and version each piece of data came from. That provenance can help teams spot when linked work originates from inconsistent configurations.
Sources
- Airbus/EADS, public statements (2006).
