← All case studies

Lessons from the record · Change & Config · Interfaces

Airbus A380 wiring: tool configuration as engineering risk

Harnesses designed in incompatible versions of CATIA across sites did not fit the airframes.

Illustrative photo for Airbus A380 wiring harnesses
Illustrative image, not a photograph of the programme.
Programme
Airbus A380 wiring harnesses
Year
2006
Sector
Aerospace & Defence
Outcome
Major delivery delays

What happened

The Airbus A380 suffered major delivery delays linked to its wiring harnesses.

The harnesses had been designed in incompatible versions of CATIA across different sites, and they did not fit the airframes.

What was found

Public statements by Airbus and EADS in 2006 attributed the delays to the wiring harness problems and the incompatible design tool versions used across sites.

Engineering lesson

The configuration of engineering tools is part of the configuration of the product. When sites work in different tool versions, the interface between their work can break without any individual design being wrong.

Tool configuration across sites is an engineering risk and needs managing like one.

The practice this points to

Bring engineering tool versions and data formats under configuration control across all sites contributing to a design.

Verify cross-site interfaces using the shared, controlled model, rather than assuming compatibility between local copies.

Where Kelvora fits

Kelvora is a requirements and assurance platform that connects to engineering tools and records which source and version each piece of data came from. That provenance can help teams spot when linked work originates from inconsistent configurations.

Sources

  1. Airbus/EADS, public statements (2006).

Last reviewed

Want to see this in practice?

Start free trialBook a demo